Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs Quadro FX 570
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1256 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.23 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | G84 | Fenghuang |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 September 2007 (18 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 460 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 289 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.680 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.02944 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 8 | no data |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 198 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 100 Watt |
FX 570 has 163.2% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 570 and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 570 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
