Radeon Pro V520 vs Vega 8 Embedded
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 220 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.97 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) |
| GPU code name | Raven | Navi 12 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (7 years ago) | 1 December 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1101 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 35.23 | 230.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.127 TFLOPS | 7.373 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 32 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 April 2018 | 1 December 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Vega 8 Embedded has 542.9% lower power consumption.
Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Vega 8 Embedded is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
