Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs Pro V340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking591not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.28no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 August 2018 (7 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584512
Core clock speed852 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1101 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate336.035.23
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs22432
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2018 19 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 35 Watt

Pro V340 has an age advantage of 4 months.

Vega 8 Embedded, on the other hand, has 557.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V340 and Radeon Vega 8 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V340 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 8 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro V340
Radeon Pro V340
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 177 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V340 or Radeon Vega 8 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.