GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 with GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
6.97

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58252
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.21
Power efficiency11.1922.54
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCezanneGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)16 April 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4484608
Core clock speed300 MHz2407 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2572 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20370.4
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS23.7 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs28144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−683%
180−190
+683%
1440p28
−686%
220−230
+686%
4K18
−678%
140−150
+678%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.38
1440pno data1.95
4Kno data3.06

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−694%
270−280
+694%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Dead Island 2 21−24
−683%
180−190
+683%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 28
−686%
220−230
+686%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−694%
270−280
+694%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−686%
110−120
+686%
Dead Island 2 21−24
−683%
180−190
+683%
Far Cry 5 20
−700%
160−170
+700%
Fortnite 63
−694%
500−550
+694%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−684%
290−300
+684%
Forza Horizon 5 24
−692%
190−200
+692%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−700%
200−210
+700%
Valorant 70−75
−643%
550−600
+643%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
−683%
180−190
+683%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−694%
270−280
+694%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
−676%
450−500
+676%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−700%
80−85
+700%
Dead Island 2 21−24
−683%
180−190
+683%
Far Cry 5 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Fortnite 27
−678%
210−220
+678%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−700%
280−290
+700%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−662%
160−170
+662%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−665%
130−140
+665%
Metro Exodus 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−683%
180−190
+683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−689%
150−160
+689%
Valorant 73
−653%
550−600
+653%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−662%
160−170
+662%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−678%
70−75
+678%
Dead Island 2 21−24
−683%
180−190
+683%
Far Cry 5 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−678%
210−220
+678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−700%
200−210
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
Valorant 25
−700%
200−210
+700%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14
−686%
110−120
+686%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−655%
400−450
+655%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Valorant 48
−629%
350−400
+629%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Valorant 25
−700%
200−210
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

This is how Vega 7 and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 683% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 686% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 678% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.97 56.22
Recency 13 April 2021 16 April 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

Vega 7 has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 706.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2813 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 612 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.