Radeon RX 5700M vs Vega 3 Efficient

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated749
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.63
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRavenNavi 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 May 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed300 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00247.7
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS7.926 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs12144
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 May 2018 1 March 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

Vega 3 Efficient has 1100% lower power consumption.

RX 5700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 3 Efficient and Radeon RX 5700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 3 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 5700M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 53 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 3 Efficient or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.