GRID RTX T10-16 vs Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRavenTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 February 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7043584
Core clock speed300 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate57.20312.5
Floating-point processing power1.83 TFLOPS9.999 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1575 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data604.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

Vega 11 Embedded has 328.6% lower power consumption.

GRID RTX T10-16, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 11 Embedded and GRID RTX T10-16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop graphics card while GRID RTX T10-16 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-16
GRID RTX T10-16

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 23 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 11 Embedded or GRID RTX T10-16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.