GRID RTX T10-16 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.88no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRavenTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7043584
Core clock speed300 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04312.5
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS9.999 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs44224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1575 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data604.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega 11 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

GRID RTX T10-16, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GRID RTX T10-16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop graphics card while GRID RTX T10-16 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-16
GRID RTX T10-16

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1970 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GRID RTX T10-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GRID RTX T10-16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.