ATI Radeon 9250 vs VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
All-In-Wonder 9200 LE All-In-Wonder 9200 SE FireMV 2200 PCI 9200 9200 LE 9200 PCI 9200 PRO 9200 SE 9200 SE PCI 9250 9250 PCI

Contents

Share:
Radeon VII Radeon VII
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.04no data
Power efficiency9.93no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameVega 20RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1400 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Wattno data
Texture fill rate420.00.96
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16354
+817600%
ATI 9250 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120no data
1440p74no data
4K57no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.83no data
1440p9.45no data
4K12.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 no data
Dead Island 2 180−190 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 136 no data
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 no data
Dead Island 2 180−190 no data
Far Cry 5 99 no data
Fortnite 195 no data
Forza Horizon 4 163 no data
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157 no data
Valorant 220−230 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 137 no data
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 no data
Dead Island 2 180−190 no data
Dota 2 160 no data
Far Cry 5 95 no data
Fortnite 154 no data
Forza Horizon 4 157 no data
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 111 no data
Metro Exodus 88 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139 no data
Valorant 220−230 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 no data
Dead Island 2 180−190 no data
Dota 2 147 no data
Far Cry 5 91 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Valorant 197 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 43 no data
Metro Exodus 56 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 250−260 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dead Island 2 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Dead Island 2 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 62 no data
Metro Exodus 37 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 no data
Valorant 240−250 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73 no data
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dead Island 2 35−40 no data
Dota 2 78 no data
Far Cry 5 59 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 7 February 2019 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Radeon VII has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon VII and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon VII Radeon VII
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250
vs
R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
Radeon VII Radeon VII
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Tesla M10 NVIDIA Tesla M10
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
i810 Graphics Intel i810 Graphics
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
RTX A40 NVIDIA RTX A40
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier AGX Xavier
HD 7600G AMD Radeon HD 7600G
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
R9 290 AMD Radeon R9 290
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
ATI X800 XT Platinum ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
vs
Radeon VII Radeon VII
UHD Graphics Intel UHD Graphics
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 940 Plus Graphics 940
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX 1650 1650
RX 7950 XT AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 2903 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.