Quadro 5000M vs Radeon VII

Place in the ranking	128	684
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.38	no data
Power efficiency	10.14	3.79
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Vega 20	GF100
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 February 2019 (7 years ago)	27 July 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	320
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	405 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,230 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.0	16.20
Floating-point processing power	13.44 TFLOPS	0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	240	40
L1 Cache	960 KB	640 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB	512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	280 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1792 MB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1024 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 38.85
+690%

Quadro 5000M 4.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16252
+689%

Samples: 868

Quadro 5000M 2059
Samples: 11

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+700%

Quadro 5000M 7767

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +764%	14−16 −764%
1440p	75 +733%	9−10 −733%
4K	58 +729%	7−8 −729%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.78	no data
1440p	9.32	no data
4K	12.05	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	210−220 +882%	21−24 −882%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	100−110 +1225%	8−9 −1225%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	136 +548%	21−24 −548%
Counter-Strike 2	210−220 +882%	21−24 −882%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Far Cry 5	99 +560%	14−16 −560%
Fortnite	195 +550%	30−33 −550%
Forza Horizon 4	163 +609%	21−24 −609%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +786%	14−16 −786%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	157 +726%	18−20 −726%
Valorant	220−230 +274%	60−65 −274%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	137 +552%	21−24 −552%
Counter-Strike 2	210−220 +882%	21−24 −882%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +228%	85−90 −228%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Dota 2	160 +281%	40−45 −281%
Far Cry 5	95 +533%	14−16 −533%
Fortnite	154 +413%	30−33 −413%
Forza Horizon 4	157 +583%	21−24 −583%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 +786%	14−16 −786%
Grand Theft Auto V	111 +594%	16−18 −594%
Metro Exodus	88 +878%	9−10 −878%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	158 +732%	18−20 −732%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +893%	14−16 −893%
Valorant	220−230 +274%	60−65 −274%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	127 +505%	21−24 −505%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Dota 2	147 +250%	40−45 −250%
Far Cry 5	91 +507%	14−16 −507%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +465%	21−24 −465%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	143 +653%	18−20 −653%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +436%	14−16 −436%
Valorant	197 +223%	60−65 −223%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

114
+280%

30−33

−280%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +890%	10−11 −890%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +626%	35−40 −626%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +975%	4−5 −975%
Metro Exodus	56 +1300%	4−5 −1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +386%	35−40 −386%
Valorant	250−260 +380%	50−55 −380%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	100−105 +1900%	5−6 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +850%	10−11 −850%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +833%	12−14 −833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +971%	7−8 −971%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

100−110
+940%

10−11

−940%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +800%	5−6 −800%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +288%	16−18 −288%
Metro Exodus	37 +825%	4−5 −825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +5300%	1−2 −5300%
Valorant	240−250 +860%	24−27 −860%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	73 +3550%	2−3 −3550%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +800%	5−6 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Dota 2	78 +359%	16−18 −359%
Far Cry 5	59 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
Forza Horizon 4	77 +1000%	7−8 −1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	58 +1060%	5−6 −1060%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

44
+780%

5−6

−780%

This is how Radeon VII and Quadro 5000M compete in popular games:

Radeon VII is 764% faster in 1080p
Radeon VII is 733% faster in 1440p
Radeon VII is 729% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Radeon VII surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	38.85	4.92
Recency	7 February 2019	27 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1792 MB
Chip lithography	7 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	100 Watt

Radeon VII has a 690% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 814% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 5000M, on the other hand, has 195% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation one.