Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.23
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega MobileGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921792
Core clock speedno data1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.032 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1753 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 400 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Mobile or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.