Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
24.12
+436%

P3200 Max-Q outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking212622
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameGP104Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA6.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+426%
19
−426%
4K55−60
+400%
11
−400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+400%
9
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+428%
18
−428%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+400%
9
−400%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+428%
18
−428%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+428%
18
−428%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+400%
26
−400%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+419%
27
−419%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+400%
22
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+431%
16
−431%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+400%
22
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+400%
12
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+400%
11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+400%
10−12
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+400%
6
−400%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+400%
13
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+419%
52
−419%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+400%
24−27
−400%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+400%
11
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+431%
16
−431%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+400%
13
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 290−300
+427%
55
−427%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+400%
8
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+380%
5
−380%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+400%
7
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+422%
23
−422%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+433%
15
−433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+436%
14
−436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+400%
8
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+424%
21−24
−424%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+400%
10
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Hitman 3 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+433%
3
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4
−425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+400%
9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 426% faster in 1080p
  • P3200 Max-Q is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.12 4.50
Recency 21 February 2018 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1222 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.