GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Radeon RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF114
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data24 September 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096336
Core clock speed1200 MHz779 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate395.843.62
Floating-point processing powerno data1.046 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25656
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length152 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1280 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MBps1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s128.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1280 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega Nano has a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 v2 ES, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.