GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Picasso RX Vega 11 RX Vega 56 RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64 Limited Edition RX Vega 64 Liquid RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega M Vega 3 Efficient Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 TU106 RTX 2060 RTX 2060 12 GB RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 2070

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce RTX 2060, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M
2018
15 Watt
15.77

RTX 2060 outperforms M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M RX Vega M
RTX 2060 RTX 2060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378174
Place by popularitynot in top-10016
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.29
Power efficiency81.1616.35
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVegaTU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)7 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121920
Core clock speed720 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs32120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M 15.77
RTX 2060 33.88
+115%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M 6557
Samples: 415
RTX 2060 14083
+115%
Samples: 33226

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−118%
120
+118%
1440p35−40
−117%
76
+117%
4K21−24
−138%
50
+138%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
1440pno data4.59
4Kno data6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140
+0%
140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 167
+0%
167
+0%
Valorant 248
+0%
248
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 155
+0%
155
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+0%
131
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 159
+0%
159
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 136
+0%
136
+0%
Valorant 247
+0%
247
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+0%
105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122
+0%
122
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 162
+0%
162
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 141
+0%
141
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 42
+0%
42
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 241
+0%
241
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 208
+0%
208
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 38
+0%
38
+0%

This is how RX Vega M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 118% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 117% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 138% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.77 33.88
Recency 1 February 2018 7 January 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega M has 967% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 115% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
RX Vega M Radeon RX Vega M
vs
RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT
Tesla P6 Tesla P6
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1050 GTX 1050
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
GeForce MX550 MX550
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GTX 1060 5 GB 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 3050 8 GB GA107
GTX 1060 5 GB 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 3060 12 GB GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 12706 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce RTX 2060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.