GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed720 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,500 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.088.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3216
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 293% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.