Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameVegano data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8533 MHz
Shared memoryno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0no data
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega M has 200% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and M4 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 44 votes

Rate M4 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or M4 Max 32-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.