RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency81.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVegaGB203
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127680
Core clock speed720 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1702 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08408.5
Floating-point processing powerno data26.14 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega M has 433% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.