Radeon RX 7400 vs RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.75

RX 7400 outperforms M GL by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking504224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.9051.58
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 22Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed931 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88257.6
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache320 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.75
RX 7400 27.40
+213%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3869
Samples: 298
RX 7400 12113
+213%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−180%
400−450
+180%
Dota 2 65−70
−209%
210−220
+209%
Fortnite 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−209%
210−220
+209%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−204%
170−180
+204%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.75 27.40
Recency 1 February 2018 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has a 213.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 51.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.