AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs R9 M395
Comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395 architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
RX Vega M GL 15.13
R9 M395 22.83 +50.9%
RX Vega M GL 3283
R9 M395 4954 +50.9%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Much newer (1 February 2018 vs 9 June 2015)
Wider memory bus (1024 vs 256 bit)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395
50.9% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests
More pipelines (1792 vs 1280)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
So, RX Vega M GL or R9 M395?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon R9 M395.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon R9 M395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.