Quadro K5000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K2200M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro K5000M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39
+39.9%

M GL outperforms K5000M by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
K5000M K5000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.02
Power efficiency11.125.17
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 22GK104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801344
Core clock speed931 MHz601 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8867.31
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.615 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs80112
L1 Cache320 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.39
+39.9%
K5000M 6.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3944
+40.7%
Samples: 332
K5000M 2804
Samples: 114

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+35.6%
59
−35.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.59

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
+39%
40−45
−39%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+30.9%
110−120
−30.9%
Dota 2 65−70
+27.8%
50−55
−27.8%
Fortnite 55−60
+39%
40−45
−39%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
+27.8%
50−55
−27.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+39%
40−45
−39%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and K5000M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 36% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 120% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 17 tests (29%)
  • there's a draw in 41 tests (71%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.39 6.71
Recency 1 February 2018 7 August 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 40% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 54% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
K5000M Quadro K5000M
vs
K4100M Quadro K4100M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Tesla P100 DGXS Tesla P100 DGXS
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Tesla M6 X2 Mobile Tesla M6 X2 Mobile
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
HD 7340 Radeon HD 7340
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Quadro M500M Quadro M500M
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Iris Plus Graphics G4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro K5000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.