GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with GeForce RTX 3080, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.06

RTX 3080 outperforms RX Vega M GL by a whopping 551% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.37
Power efficiency10.7114.17
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12808704
Core clock speed931 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88465.1
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB10 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.06
RTX 3080 65.51
+551%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3871
RTX 3080 25196
+551%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−600%
168
+600%
1440p18−20
−594%
125
+594%
4K12−14
−625%
87
+625%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.16
1440pno data5.59
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−435%
130−140
+435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−473%
149
+473%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1543%
115
+1543%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 111
+0%
111
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Hitman 3 116
+0%
116
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
+0%
248
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 96
+0%
96
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 134
+0%
134
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Hitman 3 118
+0%
118
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 326
+0%
326
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 238
+0%
238
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Hitman 3 110
+0%
110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 182
+0%
182
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 287
+0%
287
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 101
+0%
101
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 112
+0%
112
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 151
+0%
151
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 219
+0%
219
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
+0%
247
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 57
+0%
57
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135
+0%
135
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+0%
54
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+0%
95
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 594% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 625% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 is 1543% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.06 65.51
Recency 1 February 2018 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 392.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080, on the other hand, has a 551.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2
22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
6244 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.