GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Place in performance ranking	438	44
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.55	44.59
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	Ampere GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$1307	$361 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 1649% better value for money than RX Vega M GL.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	4864
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	253.1
Floating-point performance	2,588 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.40

RTX 3060 Ti 53.15
+465%

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega M GL 3631

RTX 3060 Ti 20538
+466%

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega M GL by 466% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −483%	140 +483%
1440p	14−16 −500%	84 +500%
4K	9−10 −489%	53 +489%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

−874%

185
+874%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

18−20

−384%

92
+384%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

7−8

−1000%

77
+1000%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3060 Ti is 483% faster in 1080p
RTX 3060 Ti is 500% faster in 1440p
RTX 3060 Ti is 489% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3060 Ti surpassed RX Vega M GL in all 3 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.40	53.15
Recency	1 February 2018	1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	220 Watt