GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 460 Mobile RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce GTX 765M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.75
+92.3%

M GL outperforms 765M by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
GTX 765M GTX 765M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.904.91
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 22GK106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)30 May 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed931 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz863 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8855.23
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.326 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8064
L1 Cache320 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfaceIGPMXM-B (3.0)
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.75
+92.3%
GTX 765M 4.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3869
+92.2%
Samples: 298
GTX 765M 2013
Samples: 1415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+86.3%
51
−86.3%
Full HD75−80
+87.5%
40
−87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
+93.1%
27−30
−93.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+33.6%
107
−33.6%
Dota 2 65−70
+61.9%
40−45
−61.9%
Fortnite 55−60
+93.1%
27−30
−93.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
+61.9%
40−45
−61.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+93.1%
27−30
−93.1%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1

This is how RX Vega M GL and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 86% faster in 900p
  • RX Vega M GL is 88% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 17 tests (28%)
  • there's a draw in 44 tests (72%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.75 4.55
Recency 1 February 2018 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 92.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
GTX 765M GeForce GTX 765M
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
E6760 PCIe E6760 PCIe
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
ATI X1300 CE X1300 CE
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
vs
7050 + nForce 610i 7050 + nForce 610i
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
RTX 5070 5070

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 81 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or GeForce GTX 765M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.