Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs RX Vega M GL / 870
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 412 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.59 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | Navi 44 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 4 June 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 29,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 400.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 25.64 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2518 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 322.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 4 June 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 160 Watt |
RX Vega M GL / 870 has 146.2% lower power consumption.
RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
