Radeon RX 7400 vs RX Vega M GL / 870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL / 870
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
12.03

RX 7400 outperforms M GL / 870 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.9851.58
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed931 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rateno data257.6
Floating-point processing powerno data16.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−121%
95−100
+121%
1440p28
−114%
60−65
+114%
4K14
−114%
30−35
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−122%
160−170
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−122%
160−170
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Far Cry 5 42
−126%
95−100
+126%
Fortnite 86
−121%
190−200
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%
Valorant 110−120
−123%
250−260
+123%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 52
−112%
110−120
+112%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−122%
160−170
+122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−122%
400−450
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Dota 2 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Far Cry 5 39
−118%
85−90
+118%
Fortnite 56
−114%
120−130
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
−120%
90−95
+120%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Metro Exodus 24
−108%
50−55
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−120%
90−95
+120%
Valorant 110−120
−123%
250−260
+123%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 48
−108%
100−105
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Dota 2 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Far Cry 5 36
−122%
80−85
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−108%
50−55
+108%
Valorant 110−120
−123%
250−260
+123%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 38
−124%
85−90
+124%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−127%
220−230
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Metro Exodus 14
−114%
30−33
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Valorant 130−140
−121%
300−310
+121%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 34
−121%
75−80
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Far Cry 5 24
−108%
50−55
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24
−108%
50−55
+108%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−124%
65−70
+124%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−114%
30−33
+114%
Valorant 70−75
−114%
150−160
+114%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16
−119%
35−40
+119%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Dota 2 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%
Far Cry 5 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9
−100%
18−20
+100%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and RX 7400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7400 is 121% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7400 is 114% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7400 is 114% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.03 27.40
Recency 7 January 2018 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has a 127.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 51.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 120 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.