GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking317not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361280
Core clock speed1063 MHz1265 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2118.4
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6448
TMUs9680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 27 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 7 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 72 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.