Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking678not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.03no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeTU104B
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)8 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5763072
Core clock speedno data1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data9.492 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 633% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.