Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs Radeon RX Vega 3
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 848 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 94 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.10 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Picasso | TU104B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (7 years ago) | 8 June 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1001 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.01 | 296.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3844 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 64 |
| TMUs | 12 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 8 June 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
RX Vega 3 has 633.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
