Arctic Sound 1T vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking677not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.00no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeArctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5766144
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rateno data172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data11.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 1T, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Arctic Sound 1T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
Arctic Sound 1T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Arctic Sound 1T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.