Arc Graphics 64EU vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.40no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576512
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data60.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.946 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 333% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.