Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.40no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgePanther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576512
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.355 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.9
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega 9 has 67% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.