Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Combined performance score
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms GeForce 9800M GT SLI by 130% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 617 | 853 |
Place by popularity | 36 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 0.08 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | G9x (2007−2010) |
GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | NB9E-GT2 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years old) | 15 July 2008 (15 years old) |
Current price | no data | $545 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 192 |
Core clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce 9800M GT SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
SLI options | no data | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 800 MHz |
Shared memory | - | - |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 10 |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms GeForce 9800M GT SLI by 130% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms GeForce 9800M GT SLI by 64% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 18
+157%
| 7−8
−157%
|
4K | 10
+150%
| 4−5
−150%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 15
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 24
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 13
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 26
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 11
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 22
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30
+900%
|
3−4
−900%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
Metro Exodus | 7
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 13
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Battlefield 5 | 23
+1050%
|
2−3
−1050%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 23
+667%
|
3−4
−667%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and 9800M GT SLI compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 157% faster than 9800M GT SLI
4K resolution:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 150% faster than 9800M GT SLI
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 1300% faster than the 9800M GT SLI.
- in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the 9800M GT SLI is 66.7% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 45 tests (94%)
- 9800M GT SLI is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 4.48 | 1.95 |
Recency | 26 October 2017 | 15 July 2008 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.