Radeon HD 7450M vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon HD 7450M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.08
+968%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 7450M by a whopping 968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4491096
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVegaSeymour-PRO
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)8 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current priceno data$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512160
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data370 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.600
Floating-point performanceno data224.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon HD 7450M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.08
+968%
HD 7450M 0.85

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 7450M by 968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
+913%
HD 7450M 582

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 7450M by 913% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 22428
+883%
HD 7450M 2281

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 7450M by 883% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
1440p16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
4K100−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 210−220
+950%
20
−950%
Battlefield 5 290−300
+936%
27−30
−936%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Metro Exodus 350−400
+900%
35
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 170−180
+963%
16
−963%
Battlefield 5 290−300
+936%
27−30
−936%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Metro Exodus 260−270
+940%
25
−940%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 140−150
+900%
14
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+900%
11
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+959%
16−18
−959%
Hitman 3 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Metro Exodus 180−190
+959%
17
−959%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+963%
16
−963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+963%
8
−963%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+963%
8−9
−963%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+900%
6
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and HD 7450M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 1050% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 1500% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.08 0.85
Recency 7 January 2020 8 February 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7450M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Radeon HD 7450M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 931 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.