Radeon HD 5830 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2017
4.49
+0.2%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking617619
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.47
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeCypress
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)25 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Current priceno data$11.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121120
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.80
Floating-point performanceno data1,792.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 5830 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.49
+0.2%
ATI HD 5830 4.48

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2381
+23.4%
ATI HD 5830 1930

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 5830 by 23% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
4K10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and ATI HD 5830 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 13% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 4.48
Recency 26 October 2017 25 February 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 175 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 5830.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1155 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 vote

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.