ATI Radeon 7500 vs RX Vega 64

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon 7500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
36.01
+360000%

RX Vega 64 outperforms ATI 7500 by a whopping 360000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1321523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.56no data
Power efficiency8.620.03
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameVega 10RV200
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1247 MHz290 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate395.81.740
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs2566

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s7.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 64 36.01
+360000%
ATI 7500 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 14219
+473867%
ATI 7500 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118-0−1
1440p80-0−1
4K52-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.23no data
1440p6.24no data
4K9.60no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 34 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 202 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
Metro Exodus 105 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 116 0−1
Valorant 182 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 174 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27 0−1
Dota 2 50 0−1
Far Cry 5 62 0−1
Fortnite 123 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 164 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 0−1
Metro Exodus 79 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 57 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 0−1
Valorant 92 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 24 0−1
Dota 2 138 0−1
Far Cry 5 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 143 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 95−100 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200 0−1
Valorant 140 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 37 0−1
World of Tanks 230−240 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 15 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 100 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 0−1
Metro Exodus 79 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 0−1
Valorant 95 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 70−75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 0−1
Metro Exodus 46 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7 0−1
Dota 2 96 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Fortnite 50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 59 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Valorant 49 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.01 0.01
Recency 7 August 2017 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 23 Watt

RX Vega 64 has a 360000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7500, on the other hand, has 1182.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 735 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.