FirePro D500 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
37.18
+247%

Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms FirePro D500 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking116395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.192.78
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVegaTahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$125 (0.3x MSRP)$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 64 has 1885% better value for money than FirePro D500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536
Core clock speed1630 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rate395.869.60
Floating-point performance13,353 gflops2,227 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s243.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+287%
30−35
−287%
1440p75
+257%
21−24
−257%
4K47
+292%
12−14
−292%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
+286%
21−24
−286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+295%
21−24
−295%
Battlefield 5 186
+272%
50−55
−272%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+278%
18−20
−278%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Far Cry 5 112
+273%
30−33
−273%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+260%
30−33
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+271%
45−50
−271%
Hitman 3 84
+250%
24−27
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 167
+271%
45−50
−271%
Metro Exodus 144
+260%
40−45
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+287%
30−33
−287%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 202
+267%
55−60
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100
+270%
27−30
−270%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
+278%
18−20
−278%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+283%
18−20
−283%
Battlefield 5 170
+278%
45−50
−278%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65
+261%
18−20
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Far Cry 5 86
+258%
24−27
−258%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+288%
24−27
−288%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+268%
80−85
−268%
Hitman 3 77
+267%
21−24
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
+266%
80−85
−266%
Metro Exodus 116
+287%
30−33
−287%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+281%
27−30
−281%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 164
+264%
45−50
−264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+277%
35−40
−277%
Watch Dogs: Legion 247
+253%
70−75
−253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+264%
14−16
−264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+275%
16−18
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
+286%
14−16
−286%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Far Cry 5 67
+272%
18−20
−272%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+266%
35−40
−266%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+270%
27−30
−270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 143
+258%
40−45
−258%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+267%
21−24
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+286%
14−16
−286%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+271%
24−27
−271%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+294%
18−20
−294%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+288%
24−27
−288%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
+283%
18−20
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Far Cry 5 81
+286%
21−24
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+263%
27−30
−263%
Hitman 3 50
+257%
14−16
−257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+281%
21−24
−281%
Metro Exodus 79
+276%
21−24
−276%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
+270%
27−30
−270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+280%
10−11
−280%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+288%
16−18
−288%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+269%
16−18
−269%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Hitman 3 38
+280%
10−11
−280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+256%
9−10
−256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+300%
12−14
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 29
+263%
8−9
−263%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+267%
18−20
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Metro Exodus 45
+275%
12−14
−275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+250%
6−7
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+288%
8−9
−288%

This is how RX Vega 64 and FirePro D500 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 64 is 287% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 is 257% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 is 292% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.18 10.73
Recency 14 August 2017 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 274 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 631 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.