Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition vs RX Vega 64 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Core clock speed1156 MHz958 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate319.261.31
Floating-point processing powerno data1.962 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25664
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1365 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s174.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R9 M390 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 212.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
AMD Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano or Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.