Radeon Pro V340 16 GB vs RX Vega 64 Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584 ×2
Core clock speed1156 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate319.2336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs256224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width2048 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1600 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 230 Watt

Pro V340 16 GB has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon Pro V340 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 16 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
AMD Radeon Pro V340 16 GB
Radeon Pro V340 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano or Radeon Pro V340 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.