ATI Radeon DDR MAXX vs RX Vega 64 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameVega 10Rage 6
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1156 MHz148 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate319.20.89 ×2
ROPs642 ×2
TMUs2566 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 2x
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB ×2
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1600 MHz148 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s4.736 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.07.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 1 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

RX Vega 64 Nano has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon DDR MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
ATI Radeon DDR MAXX
Radeon DDR MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon DDR MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano or Radeon DDR MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.