Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Radeon RX 9070 GRE, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
5.87

RX 9070 GRE outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 778% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.42
Power efficiency27.9116.71
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega RenoirNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)8 May 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed400 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2790 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data535.7
Floating-point processing powerno data34.28 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−750%
170−180
+750%
1440p24
−775%
210−220
+775%
4K18
−733%
150−160
+733%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.23
1440pno data2.61
4Kno data3.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
−765%
450−500
+765%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−746%
110−120
+746%
Dead Island 2 23
−770%
200−210
+770%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 22
−764%
190−200
+764%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−753%
290−300
+753%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−750%
85−90
+750%
Dead Island 2 20
−750%
170−180
+750%
Far Cry 5 15
−767%
130−140
+767%
Fortnite 33
−748%
280−290
+748%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−733%
100−105
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−757%
180−190
+757%
Valorant 97
−776%
850−900
+776%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−757%
180−190
+757%
Counter-Strike 2 14
−757%
120−130
+757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56
−704%
450−500
+704%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−757%
60−65
+757%
Dead Island 2 15
−767%
130−140
+767%
Dota 2 42
−733%
350−400
+733%
Far Cry 5 16
−775%
140−150
+775%
Fortnite 22
−764%
190−200
+764%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−767%
130−140
+767%
Metro Exodus 8
−775%
70−75
+775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−757%
180−190
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−775%
140−150
+775%
Valorant 73
−722%
600−650
+722%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−742%
160−170
+742%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−775%
70−75
+775%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−742%
160−170
+742%
Dota 2 40
−775%
350−400
+775%
Far Cry 5 16
−775%
140−150
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−746%
220−230
+746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−757%
180−190
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−764%
95−100
+764%
Valorant 19
−742%
160−170
+742%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−753%
290−300
+753%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−733%
75−80
+733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−695%
350−400
+695%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%
Valorant 49
−716%
400−450
+716%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−750%
85−90
+750%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−764%
95−100
+764%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Valorant 22
−764%
190−200
+764%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Dota 2 19
−742%
160−170
+742%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RX 9070 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 GRE is 750% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 GRE is 775% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 GRE is 733% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.87 51.54
Recency 7 January 2020 8 May 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 220 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 1366.7% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 GRE, on the other hand, has a 778% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Radeon RX 9070 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 747 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Radeon RX 9070 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.