Radeon HD 7660G vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon HD 7660G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.07
+393%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 7660G by a whopping 393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5871047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.922.42
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameVega RenoirDevastator
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed400 MHz686 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz686 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data16.46
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5268 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6.07
+393%
HD 7660G 1.23

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 4210
+298%
HD 7660G 1057

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21857
+241%
HD 7660G 6409

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 182608
+179%
HD 7660G 65558

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p50−55
+355%
11
−355%
Full HD20
+33.3%
15
−33.3%
1200p40−45
+344%
9
−344%
1440p22
+450%
4−5
−450%
4K17
+467%
3−4
−467%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Elden Ring 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Metro Exodus 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Valorant 25
+400%
5−6
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 24
+380%
5
−380%
Elden Ring 8 0−1
Far Cry 5 26
+189%
9
−189%
Fortnite 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+255%
11
−255%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Valorant 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
World of Tanks 56
+43.6%
39
−43.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Dota 2 40
+167%
15
−167%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Valorant 19
+533%
3−4
−533%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Elden Ring 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45
+529%
7−8
−529%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 19
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and HD 7660G compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 355% faster in 900p
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 33% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 344% faster in 1200p
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 450% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 467% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 1800% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7660G is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 38 tests (93%)
  • HD 7660G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.07 1.23
Recency 7 January 2020 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 393.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 704 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 135 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.