ATI Radeon HD 4270 vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon HD 4270, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms HD 4270 by a whopping 2027% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 655 | 1420 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.36 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | RV6xx (2008−2010) |
| GPU code name | Vega Renoir | RS880M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (6 years ago) | 1 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 590 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 10.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 20 | 0−1 |
| 1440p | 24
+2300%
| 1−2
−2300%
|
| 4K | 18 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 52
+2500%
|
2−3
−2500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 15
+200%
|
5−6
−200%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 22
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 34
+3300%
|
1−2
−3300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 33
+3200%
|
1−2
−3200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 11
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| Valorant | 97
+288%
|
24−27
−288%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 21 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 56
+331%
|
12−14
−331%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| Dota 2 | 42
+367%
|
9−10
−367%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 22
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
| Valorant | 73
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 19 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Dota 2 | 40
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+767%
|
3−4
−767%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 11
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
| Valorant | 19
−31.6%
|
24−27
+31.6%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+3300%
|
1−2
−3300%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| Valorant | 49
+2350%
|
2−3
−2350%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+1200%
|
1−2
−1200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 22
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 19 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and ATI HD 4270 compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 2300% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 2100% faster.
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 4270 is 32% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) performs better in 29 tests (97%)
- ATI HD 4270 performs better in 1 test (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.53 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 1 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 55 nm |
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 2026.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4270 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
