Quadro K1200 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Radeon RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 9
VS
Quadro K1200 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D Quadro K2200 Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 SYNC Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Quadro K1200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.04

K1200 outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking583524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.49
Power efficiency28.0711.80
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameVega RenoirGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$321.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed400 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data35.97
Floating-point processing powerno data1.151 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno data128 Bit
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 80 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−20%
24−27
+20%
1440p22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
4K18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data13.42
1440pno data11.92
4Kno data15.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Hitman 3 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 97
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
Metro Exodus 23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−21%
75−80
+21%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
−23.3%
90−95
+23.3%
Metro Exodus 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
−20%
60−65
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Hitman 3 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Quadro K1200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K1200 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K1200 is 23% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K1200 is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.04 7.62
Recency 7 January 2020 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Quadro K1200, on the other hand, has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Quadro K1200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
R9 M470 Radeon R9 M470
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GRID K260Q GRID K260Q
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile
HD 7520G Radeon HD 7520G
vs
Grenada Grenada
HD 6320 Radeon HD 6320
vs
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
GMA 950 GMA 950
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
9600M GS GeForce 9600M GS
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
9800 GTX GeForce 9800 GTX
vs
GT 420M GeForce GT 420M
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 GeForce4 Ti 4200
GM108 GM108
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 680 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 99 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.