Radeon HD 4550 vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) with Radeon HD 4550, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
3.04
+398%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms ATI HD 4550 by a whopping 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7341164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeRV710
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)30 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$59
Current priceno data$116 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38480
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data242 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point performanceno data96 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 4550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.48 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+433%
3−4
−433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+338%
8
−338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+338%
8
−338%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+355%
11
−355%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+338%
8
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+350%
10
−350%
Hitman 3 30−33
+329%
7
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+374%
18−20
−374%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+362%
13
−362%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+350%
10
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+369%
16
−369%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+344%
9
−344%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+329%
7
−329%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+367%
15
−367%
Hitman 3 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+374%
18−20
−374%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+364%
14
−364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+344%
9
−344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+371%
16−18
−371%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+362%
12−14
−362%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+374%
18−20
−374%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+358%
12
−358%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+350%
6
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+371%
16−18
−371%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Hitman 3 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and ATI HD 4550 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 433% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 0.61
Recency 7 January 2018 30 September 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
ATI Radeon HD 4550
Radeon HD 4550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 99 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.