Radeon HD 2900 XT vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
3.04
+77.8%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 2900 XT by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking735890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeR600
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)14 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speedno data743 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data720 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.89
Floating-point performanceno data475.5 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 2900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1656 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data106.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkanno dataN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hitman 3 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and ATI HD 2900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 78% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 1.71
Recency 7 January 2018 14 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 215 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2900 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 61 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.