Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Place in the ranking	763	474
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.04	35.05
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	2 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	896
Core clock speed	no data	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	94.92
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3.04

T500 Mobile 9.11
+200%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2991

T500 Mobile 7996
+167%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2245

T500 Mobile 4225
+88.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16787

T500 Mobile 23453
+39.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 552

T500 Mobile 1788
+224%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 −157%	36 +157%
1440p	5−6 −200%	15 +200%
4K	5−6 −240%	17 +240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−133%

14−16
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 −175%	21−24 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Battlefield 5	11 −145%	27−30 +145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8 −125%	18−20 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −400%	30 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	18 −233%	60−65 +233%
Hitman 3	7 −143%	16−18 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Metro Exodus	13 −169%	35−40 +169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10 −150%	24−27 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 −150%	30−33 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9 −144%	21−24 +144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −300%	60−65 +300%
Hitman 3	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Metro Exodus	5 −460%	27−30 +460%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 −114%	30−33 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −64.7%	28 +64.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −350%	27 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Hitman 3	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 −192%	35−40 +192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −217%	19 +217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−157%

18−20

+157%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Hitman 3	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −217%	55−60 +217%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−167%

16−18

+167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−150%

10−11

+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 157% faster in 1080p
T500 Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
T500 Mobile is 240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T500 Mobile is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T500 Mobile is ahead in 45 tests (66%)
there's a draw in 23 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.04	9.11
Recency	7 January 2018	2 December 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	18 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 20% lower power consumption.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 199.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.