GeForce Go 7600 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce Go 7600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
2.85
+819%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms Go 7600 by a whopping 819% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7781315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.00no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeG73
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38413
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.803.600
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2.85
+819%
Go 7600 0.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1173
+824%
Go 7600 127

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 8 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Valorant 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Dota 2 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
Far Cry 5 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Fortnite 9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Valorant 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 32
+146%
12−14
−146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Dota 2 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Far Cry 5 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Valorant 4−5 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
World of Tanks 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 3−4 0−1

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Go 7600 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 1300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 28 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 0.31
Recency 7 January 2018 1 March 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has a 819.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
GeForce Go 7600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 72 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.