Radeon R7 M370 vs RX Vega 5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and Radeon R7 M370, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.61
+26%

RX Vega 5 outperforms R7 M370 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking658722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.21no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameVegaLitho
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz960 MHz
Number of transistorsno data690 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data23.04
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data73.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 5 4.61
+26%
R7 M370 3.66

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 5 3535
+40.1%
R7 M370 2524

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 5 11704
+37.5%
R7 M370 8513

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 5 2438
+38.5%
R7 M370 1760

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 5 18282
+76.4%
R7 M370 10364

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 5 128628
+8.3%
R7 M370 118746

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+28.6%
14
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 22
+69.2%
12−14
−69.2%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Fortnite 52
+174%
18−20
−174%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 18
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
−26%
60−65
+26%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 39
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
Far Cry 5 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Fortnite 21
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 4
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10
−40%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 37
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+50%
6
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Valorant 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how RX Vega 5 and R7 M370 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 29% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 174% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the R7 M370 is 58% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is ahead in 52 tests (85%)
  • R7 M370 is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.61 3.66
Recency 7 January 2020 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

RX Vega 5 has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M370 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 219 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 85 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Radeon R7 M370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.