Radeon HD 6750M vs RX Vega 5

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and Radeon HD 6750M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.65
+90.6%

RX Vega 5 outperforms HD 6750M by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking654843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.384.81
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVegaWhistler
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320480
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data716 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.576 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 5 4.65
+90.6%
HD 6750M 2.44

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 5 3535
+205%
HD 6750M 1159

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 5 11704
+113%
HD 6750M 5483

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+90.5%
21
−90.5%
Full HD19
−26.3%
24
+26.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+50%
6−7
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+75%
12−14
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+100%
9−10
−100%
Valorant 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Dota 2 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 21
+40%
14−16
−40%
Fortnite 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
−125%
9−10
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
World of Tanks 50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Dota 2 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
World of Tanks 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how RX Vega 5 and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 90% faster in 900p
  • HD 6750M is 26% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 1700% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6750M is 125% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is ahead in 52 tests (93%)
  • HD 6750M is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.65 2.44
Recency 7 January 2020 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 90.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 218 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 53 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.