Radeon HD 6370M vs RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and Radeon HD 6370M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.47
+548%

RX Vega 5 outperforms HD 6370M by a whopping 548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6551172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.334.49
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVegaRobson
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)26 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speedno data750 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data292 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 5 4.47
+548%
HD 6370M 0.69

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 5 11704
+787%
HD 6370M 1319

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+850%
2−3
−850%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+200%
3−4
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Valorant 18
+800%
2−3
−800%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 21
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 21
+163%
8−9
−163%
Fortnite 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
World of Tanks 50
+163%
18−20
−163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 37
+640%
5−6
−640%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how RX Vega 5 and HD 6370M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 850% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 2600% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the HD 6370M is 29% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is ahead in 33 tests (92%)
  • HD 6370M is ahead in 2 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 0.69
Recency 7 January 2020 26 November 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 11 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 547.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6370M, on the other hand, has 36.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6370M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD Radeon HD 6370M
Radeon HD 6370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 218 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 136 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.