RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Radeon RX Vega 5

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.46

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms RX Vega 5 by a whopping 1827% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiency21.05no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVegaGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32024064
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−1742%
350−400
+1742%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data24.47

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Counter-Strike 2 43
−1760%
800−850
+1760%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−1789%
170−180
+1789%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 7
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Battlefield 5 22
−1718%
400−450
+1718%
Counter-Strike 2 29
−1797%
550−600
+1797%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Far Cry 5 15
−1767%
280−290
+1767%
Fortnite 52
−1823%
1000−1050
+1823%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
Forza Horizon 5 17
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Valorant 55−60
−1742%
1050−1100
+1742%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Battlefield 5 18
−1567%
300−310
+1567%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
−1800%
950−1000
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Dota 2 39
−1823%
750−800
+1823%
Far Cry 5 12
−1817%
230−240
+1817%
Fortnite 21
−1805%
400−450
+1805%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
Forza Horizon 5 15
−1767%
280−290
+1767%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−1823%
250−260
+1823%
Metro Exodus 4
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Valorant 55−60
−1742%
1050−1100
+1742%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Battlefield 5 16
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Dota 2 37
−1792%
700−750
+1792%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1823%
250−260
+1823%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1650%
350−400
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−1789%
170−180
+1789%
Valorant 55−60
−1742%
1050−1100
+1742%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
−1817%
230−240
+1817%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−1718%
600−650
+1718%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−1733%
550−600
+1733%
Valorant 45−50
−1815%
900−950
+1815%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1800%
190−200
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Valorant 21−24
−1718%
400−450
+1718%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 14−16
−1757%
260−270
+1757%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%

This is how RX Vega 5 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 1742% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 85.96
Recency 7 January 2020 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

RX Vega 5 has 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 1827.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 226 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.